<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://crdwatch.ca/2026/04/22/vancouver-proves-exactly-what-happens-when-a-council-abandons-its-legal-tools-by-arthur-mcinnis/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>CRD Watch Homepage  </news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-23T05:14:55+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Vancouver Proves Exactly What Happens When A Council Abandons Its Legal Tools, by Arthur McInnis</news:title><news:keywords>development, real estate, OCP, politics, community, Missing Middle, housing, Victoria Council, local government, prezoning, accountability, urban planning, Bill 44, Bill 47, Public Hearings, Local Government Act, broadway plan, Vancouver, City of Victoria Council, SSMUH, blanket upzoning, law, bylaw, Arthur McInnis, Bill M216, zoning, housing policy, Master Development Agreements, 2026, CACs, Victoria OCP, VictoriaBC, YYJ, Municipal Politics, #RuleOfLaw, VictoriaElection2026, Community Voice, Planning Law, Mount Pleasant, Victoria municipal election, Carol Volkart, Mike Mangan, reductions in public input, lack of public hearings, City staff, DP conditions, development permit conditions, Phased Development Agreements, rezonings, rules, legal tools, voters</news:keywords></news:news></url><url><loc>https://crdwatch.ca/2026/04/22/bc-government-committee-to-review-the-lobbyists-transparency-act-recommends-a-person-not-be-considered-an-inhouse-lobbyist-below-50-hours-of-lobbying-annually/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>CRD Watch Homepage  </news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-23T04:29:18+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>BC Government Committee to review the Lobbyists Transparency Act, recommends a person not be considered an &#8220;in-house lobbyist&#8221;, if they lobby the provincial government for less than 50 hours a year.</news:title><news:keywords>bc-ndp, lobbying, british-columbia, politics, province of BC, lobbying influence, lta, history, lack of transparency, BC Lobbyists Registry, MLAs, Lobbyists Transparenct Act, under the radar, in-house lobbyists, Special Committee to Review the Lobbyists Transparency Act, Committee, lack of accountability., Legislative Assembly of British Columbia, cloaking, in-house lobbyist, recommendations, hidden-lobbying-influence, eby-government, opposition-mlas</news:keywords></news:news></url><url><loc>https://crdwatch.ca/2026/04/22/even-when-the-government-cheats-you-can-still-win-by-arthur-mcinnis/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>CRD Watch Homepage  </news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-22T08:46:53+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Even When the Government Cheats, You Can Still Win, by Arthur McInnis</news:title><news:keywords>public participation, rezoning, OCP, public input, City of Victoria, province of BC, prezoning, upzoning, legislation, BC NDP, blanket upzoning, law, legal, Lack of democracy, Arthur McInnis, governance, judicial review, court, Municipal Governance, local governance, litigation, BC Supreme Court, Bill 26 (2023), Vancouver city Council, Kitsilano Coalition, The Arbutus Project, precedent, lawsuit, BC Court of Appeal, Barbour v. UBC (2010), Rule of Law, Democratic Accountability</news:keywords></news:news></url><url><loc>https://crdwatch.ca/2026/04/21/saanich-councillors-cost-taxpayers-close-to-100000-in-off-island-travel-conference-expenses-this-term-according-to-foi-response/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>CRD Watch Homepage  </news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-22T01:30:05+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Saanich councillors cost taxpayers close to $100,000 in off-island travel/conference expenses this term, according to FOI response.</news:title><news:keywords>Saanich, Saanich Council, grumpy taxpayers, accountability, Nathalie Chambers, FOI, Freedom of Information, District of Saanich, Dean Murdock, Colin Plant, Judy Brownoff, Susan Brice, Teale Phelps Bondaroff, Mena Westhaver, Karen Harper, taxpayers, Zac de Vries, travel expenses, Grumpy Taxpayers of Greater Victoria, questionable use of public funds, questionable use of taxpayer funds, costs, Grumpy Taxpayer$</news:keywords></news:news></url></urlset>
