<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://crdwatch.ca/2026/07/22/oak-bay-development-dispute-heads-to-b-c-supreme-court-could-set-precedent-for-uplands-and-municipal-planning-across-b-c/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>CRD Watch Homepage  </news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-07-22T17:42:33+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Oak Bay Development Dispute Heads to B.C. Supreme Court, Could Set Precedent for Uplands and Municipal Planning Across B.C.</news:title><news:keywords>development, british columbia, planning, Oak Bay, petition, heritage, urban ecology, District of Oak Bay, Oak Bay Council, Bill 44, legislation, municipalities, local governments, Housing Bills, law, Official Community Plans, developers, bylaw, Evan Brown, Uplands, zoning, judicial review, Advisory Design Panel, court, B.C. Supreme Court, municipal planning, B.C., 2830 and 2850 Lansdowne Road, application, 2XC Developments Ltd., National Historic Site of Canada, R-2 lots, Oak Bay Special Powers Act, Uplands Regulations Bylaw, neighbourhood character, tree impacts, 2560 Dorset Road.</news:keywords></news:news></url></urlset>