Mayor Alto’s Proximity Problem with a Ward Crusade vs. Her Own Place of Residence


By Arthur McInnis
March 23, 2026


Mayor Marianne Alto has made residency the cornerstone of her case for electoral reform at the Greater Victoria School Board. Her argument is straightforward.  She believes that trustees should live in the communities they represent.  In her view geographic proximity produces accountability or distance produces drift.

It is a defensible position. It is also one she does not apply to herself.

Do as I Say, Not as I Live


Alto resides in Saanich while serving as Mayor of Victoria. This is legal even if democratically ill-advised. Our Community Charter, unlike the Vancouver Charter, imposes no residency requirement on mayors. But legality is not the standard she has set. The standard she has set is that a representative who does not live among the people they serve cannot fully understand or be accountable to those people. She has used that standard to argue for restructuring an elected board. Her own office sits on the wrong side of it.

Merge with Me, Ward with Them


The inconsistency is sharpest on the amalgamation question. Alto has committed to placing a Victoria-Saanich amalgamation referendum on the 2026 ballot, premised on the idea that the two municipalities are functionally one community and should be governed as one.  But you cannot simultaneously argue that geographic boundaries matter enough to require ward-based trustees and that they matter so little that two municipalities should merge. These are not complementary reforms.  They pull in opposite directions. Ward systems sharpen local boundaries while amalgamation dissolves them. Holding both positions at once suggests the democratic principle being applied by the Mayor is whichever one is most useful to her now.


Drawing the Line


The boundary question adds a further complication. A ward system for SD61 would not simply trace existing municipal lines. The district spans Victoria, Saanich, Oak Bay, Esquimalt, View Royal, and several smaller jurisdictions, and ward boundaries would need to be drawn to achieve rough population equality among trustee electoral areas. So this is a requirement that cuts across municipal boundaries rather than following them. A ward trustee might end up representing a portion of Saanich and a portion of Victoria simultaneously, which quietly undermines Alto’s clean residency principle. The hyper-local accountability she is promising depends on boundaries that do not yet exist and may not, when drawn, deliver the geographic clarity the argument assumes.

There is also the question of who draws those boundaries and by what criteria. The Province holds significant authority over school board structure, and boundary-drawing is where the real political power in any electoral reform sits. Alto’s advocacy positions Victoria City Council as the champion of a reformed SD61. But the shape of that reform, which communities end up in which ward, whose voices get concentrated and whose get diluted, will largely be determined elsewhere. That is a significant amount of democratic consequence to attach to a principle whose geographic logic has not yet been tested against an actual map.


The Political Consequence is Straightforward


Critics of the SD61 ward proposal, particularly those in Saanich and Esquimalt who worry about being absorbed into a Victoria-dominated board, can point directly at the Mayor’s residential address and ask one simple question.  If residency is essential for a trustee, why is it optional for the Mayor who is leading this charge? Alto has no clean answer to that question, because there is not one.

Alto’s support for ward-based representation may well be the right policy. But credibility on a principle requires living by it. She has staked her electoral reform argument on a residency principle she does not herself meet.  Rather than resolve that contradiction by moving to Victoria though, Alto has decided to move Victoria.


—————————————————————————————————

See also:

Index of Articles and Other Resources on Amalgamation. – CRD Watch Homepage


“We need to take the approach of all areas potentially supporting up to six storeys to ensure we have a pivotal opportunity to arrive at where we will inevitably need to get by 2050” – Quote from Sept 19, 2024 UDI Workshop on City of Victoria Official Community Plan (OCP) update. – CRD Watch Homepage

One response to “Mayor Alto’s Proximity Problem with a Ward Crusade vs. Her Own Place of Residence, by Arthur McInnis”

  1. Gord Persson Avatar
    Gord Persson

    The first challenge is to somehow get all of these outstanding commentaries by Arthur in front of all eligible voters. The second challenge is to reach the same audience with detailed biographies, accomplishments and failures of each candidate come election time. I am convinced that some people do not vote simply because they do not know who to vote for. The brief rundown that appears in the Colonist just doesn’t do it. Based on that presentation I voted for Dell and Cardona. What a mistake that was and had the bio contained information on their previous associations and activities I certainly would not have voted for either of them. Somehow the true characters of candidates must be exposed to voters in as public a platform as possible. And, with all due respect, this platform is not one of the best for that. I fear its reach is not the target that needs to be reached and it is very difficult to use. But surely there are smart communications experts who know exactly how to get these and then comments of other knowledgeable contributors to the right target audience.

    Like

Leave a comment